Judgment in our favour received this morning from the Supreme Court of Appeal

I previously wrote an article dealing with the rights of shareholders to convene shareholders’ meetings (See WHEN DIRECTORS PARALYSE A COMPANY –  DIRECTORS’ ABILITY TO PREVENT THE CONVENING OF SHAREHOLDERS’ MEETINGS  By Don Mahon)

 

This morning, I received the following judgment in our favour from the Supreme Court of Appeal which deals with the issue:

Butler v Van Zyl (554-13) [2014] ZASCA 81 (30 May 2014)

Advertisements

The DMR remains adamant that current version of the MPRDA Amendment Bill will be passed.

The DMR remains adamant that current version of the MPRDA Amendment Bill will be passed

via Read this article on Polity.